The Borders, Boundaries, and Barriers conference will be held in Oxford in April 2026. The programme includes several board members of MJSN! and registration is available for in-person and online attendance.
All posts by Dean A. Irwin
Virtual Talk: Locating and Mapping the Jews of Medieval Lincoln (27 February)
As part of a project to identify and write biographies of all of the Jews of the medieval Lincoln Jewry, Natasha Jenman, Luka Liu, and Josh Outhwaite have been working on records of Jewish property ownership in the city across the thirteenth century. This allows them to identify those individuals who will be prioritised and begin to construct a database of the Jews of medieval Lincoln.
In this talk, chaired by Dr Dean Irwin, they will explore the sources for the Lincoln Jewry, how they’ve used them, and visually demonstrate the distribution of Jews on the city. It will then trace the careers of some of the Jews we’ve already worked on.
Recent News About the Medieval Jewish Cemetery in London
Comment by Dean A. Irwin (University of Lincoln)
Newspaper articles published in the past week, suggesting the ‘discovery’ of the medieval Jewish cemetery at London, were met with a mixture of surprise and confusion. Its location is well known (just beyond Cripplegate, with part of the estate next to St. Giles in Cripplegate), and a remarkable set of sources detail the position and expansion of the site. We know more about this cemetery than any other medieval Anglo-Jewish burial ground, with the possible exception of Jewbury (York). Nor was this forgotten following the general expulsion from the Jews England in 1290, as some newspaper articles claimed. Rather, its location was well known into the Early Modern period. Scholarly knowledge of the site was much advanced by excavations of part of the site in 1948-49 by W. F. Grimes, partly funded by the Jewish Historical Society of England. This work was unable to locate any bodies or tombstones but did find evidence to suggest that the bodies had been exhumed. The historical records relating to the London Jewry were discussed in an important article by Marjorie B. Honeybourne in 1959-61, which includes a useful map of the probable site. In the 1990s, Joe Hillaby also produced two articles on the London Jewry, which emphasised the location of the cemetery, and situated it within the broader context of the community.
Prior to 1177, this was the only Jewish cemetery in England. Following this date, Roger of Howden tells us, Henry II granted permission for Jewish communities elsewhere in the country to purchase land outside of the city walls to serve as cemeteries. Even then, however, London retained national importance, and not every Jewish community could afford a plot (nor did every town have space outside the walls to accommodate them). Following the massacre of the York Jewry in March 1190, the bodies were transported for burial in London. Equally, although it is often said that the Jews of Canterbury had their own cemetery, this not the case, and they seem to have shared with London throughout the thirteenth century. It was presumably here also that the 269 Jews who were executed at the Tower of London in 1278-79 were buried, given that an exemption had been purchased to ensure that those convicted of felony could be buried here as well. Clearly, we are dealing with a large site, therefore, and this is borne out by the historical record. Based on the surviving sources Honeybourne suggested that the site might have occupied an area of about 2.5 acres by 1290, with the original site before 1177 perhaps covering 1.5 acres.
The historical narrative which accompanied the news release, lent particularly into the lachrymose conception of Jewish history. The suggestion was made that, following the Expulsion, the cemetery was desecrated. Although we have evidence of such activities on the Continent (at Regensburg, for example) this is not the case for England. Moreover, as my own work has argued, there is remarkably little evidence of urban reactions against the Jews (or the memory of them) in the towns of England between the fourteenth and sixteenth centuries, so the idea of desecration does not fit that model. Equally, it was argued that ‘They [the Jews] weren’t free but lived under the protection of William [the Conqueror]. They didn’t even own the hair on their heads’. This is a particularly problematic reading of the sources, of the type which was commonly promulgated a century ago. Now, we understand that a great deal more nuance is required to explain the position of the Jews in medieval England – one of the aims that my book project Jews and Christians as Neighbours in Medieval English Towns (Palgrave, 2028)aims to tackle. Unfortunately, the historical commentary on the associated website, also requires much work. Of the three massacres cited, only one actually happened although it is misdated. While Henry I issued a charter to the Jews of England and Normandy (later confirmed by King John and Henry III), it was the Laws of Edward the Confessor (compiled later in his reign) that established royal authority over the Jews (if it could be exercised). The Exchequer of the Jews was not founded in 1194 and Edward I was not deeply indebted to the Jews – either at the time of the Expulsion or at any other point in his life.
It must be noted that important work has been done on the themes raised by the newspaper articles. Rory MacLellan’s work on Jews and the Tower of London has done much to advance our knowledge of individual Jews in London (whether at the Tower or in the city itself). Toni Griffiths did important work on memory of medieval Jewry in her doctoral work at the University of Winchester and is the leading expert on medieval Anglo-Jewish cemeteries. Pinchas Roth has published on the Hebrew responsa of Rabbi Elias son of Rabbi Moses, who in 1256-57 was the keeper of the cemetery. Finally, and less importantly, I have published on the social structure of the London Jewry with reference to Rabbi Elias son of Rabbi Moses and Cresse son of Genta, as well as the archae system and records of Jewish moneylending activities at London. Volume 3 of Hebrew and Hebrew-Latin Documents, currently being edited by Judith Olszowy-Schlanger and myself, also includes several fascinating London documents which have not previously been published. One hopes that a century of historical progress will be incorporated into the proposed exhibition!
PhD Studentship: ‘A Minority At Law: Jews And The Courts In Medieval England, c. 1216-1290’
An exciting opportunity has arisen to undertake a PhD as part of a Collaborative Doctoral Partnership between Queen Mary, University of London, and The National Archives. Working with Professor Miri Rubin (QMUL) and Dr Paul Dryburgh (The National Archives), the successful candidate will undertake their doctoral research, exploring ‘A Minority at Law: Jews and the Courts in Medieval England, c. 1216-1290’. For further details, please contact Professor Rubin (m.e.rubin@qmul.ac.uk).
Public Talk: Louise Wilkinson, ‘Researching Lincoln’s Medieval Jewish Community in Lincolnshire Archives’
On 26 June, Professor Louise J. Wilkinson will give a talk in the Lincolnshire Archives about the medieval Lincoln Jewry. This will be followed by a document exhibition showing charters and manuscripts which reveal this history of the community.
The Medieval Anglo-Jewish Women (MAJW) Project
Adrienne Williams Boyarin (University of Victoria) discusses her new project which seeks to make the lives of medieval England’s Jews accessible.
Cultural and biographical study of Anglo-Jewish women is difficult. Scarcity of women’s voices, gendered divides in literacy and religious practice, marriages, name changes — all can make medieval women difficult to find let alone assess, and this is of course true across religious lines. As Charlotte Newman Goldy has put it, “Even Christian women’s lives most often need to be examined in aggregate, and that can obscure both the humanity of their stories and their variations.”[i] Further, all scholarship on medieval Anglo-Jewish women must cope with a primary methodological problem that scholarship on Anglo-Jewish men does not necessitate: the vast majority of the evidence for Jewish women in England comes from Latin legal and financial records. There are many thousands of Latin records of many hundreds of Jewish women in medieval England—dispersed through the Plea Rolls of the Exchequer of the Jews, Close Rolls, Patent Rolls, Liberate Rolls, Fine Rolls, Tower of London receipts, endless writs, and more—but all are filtered through an oppressive (Christian) bureaucracy. At the same time, these records provide historically verifiable information; they allow us to see English Jewish women whom we could not otherwise see, and they allow us to reconstruct some (fragmentary) part of their lives. But can we tell Jewish stories with this material?
Continue reading The Medieval Anglo-Jewish Women (MAJW) ProjectSpecial Issue: ‘From Paris to Tortosa, via Barcelona (1240-1413), Characters, Issues and Problems in Medieval Jewish-Christian Disputations’
Edited by Francesco Bianchi, the special issue of Perichoresis appeared in 2020. It features five articles which explore ‘Jewish-Christian polemic in the Middle Ages’. The open access articles focus primarily upon the Jews in the south of Europe.
Lecture: John Tolan ‘The Mark of Cain: Jews in English Society in the Thirteenth Century’ (19 May)
On 19 May, John Tolan will speak on the topic of his new book, England’s Jews, at Queen Mary University of London. This in-person event is free but registration is required.
Symposium: ‘Medieval Matters: A Symposium in honour of Professor Miri Rubin’
Medieval Matters has been organised in honour of Professor Miri Rubin at QMUL. It will be held on 29-30 June and includes papers on the Jews by Deeana Klepper, Ephraim Shoham-Steiner and Elisheva Baumgarten.
New Book: Judith Olszowy-Schlanger, ‘Learning Hebrew in Medieval England’
In her new study for the Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, Professor Judith Olszowy-Schlanger explores the learning of Hebrew in medieval England. The study is an edition and analysis of a thirteenth century multilingual manuscript in the archives of Longleat house.